BizTalk Performance server roles
hi,
what better configuration in terms of performance if there 3 physical servers (all same specs) available:
configuration a: 2 biztalk servers joined in group , 1 sql server.
or
configuration b: 1 biztalk server , 2 sql server not clustered (e.g. 1 serving host messagebox database , 1 serving host tracking, etc).
this might little hard answer because depends on lot more things mentioned above try anyway. answers?
thanks
what better configuration in terms of performance if there 3 physical servers (all same specs) available:
configuration a: 2 biztalk servers joined in group , 1 sql server.
or
configuration b: 1 biztalk server , 2 sql server not clustered (e.g. 1 serving host messagebox database , 1 serving host tracking, etc).
this might little hard answer because depends on lot more things mentioned above try anyway. answers?
thanks
ah yes, note makes perfect sense - going 1 3 related message boxes on same group, split out biztalk databases between 2 different sql servers.
thiago almeida - http://connectedthoughts.wordpress.com
thiago almeida - http://connectedthoughts.wordpress.com
BizTalk Server > BizTalk Server General
Comments
Post a Comment